27
Jul

The pretty women of Paris

   Posted by: Kathe   in Performance, Research

…got nothin’ on the floozies of the Poppy, except possibly a more advanced command of French.  Have a gander at these geese as you ponder, perhaps, what might appear in a sexual guidebook, what is essential, what ought to be left out, based on your own desires, or your desire to desire (not at all the same thing, right?) …. As noted in the previous post, love is a very tough article.  Sex is play. Love is art. Both involve discipline, of course, but so does everything worth the doing, including writing, puppeteering, making hay, and making believe.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, July 27th, 2010 at 1:11 pm and is filed under Performance, Research. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 comments so far

Clive Hicks-Jenkins
 1 

The Pretty Women of Paris is an extraordinary idea. The two extracts online are entertaining enough, but I assume they’re a concoction of the woman who claims to have found an original copy on her boyfriend’s bookshelves. Fiction masquerading as history. However I think the illustrations are out of sync with the writing… a tad too pretty! Early porn photographs are robustly anatomical. The women in them are real and often quite fleshy, their clothes grimy, hard-worn and greasy at the seams. The writing on show in the extracts… the first one particularly, could have done with something less fey than the hippy-chick prettiness of the accompanying drawing.

Kathe, I haven’t heard anyone use the word ‘gander’ to denote ‘look’ since my father died! You made me smile reading that!

July 28th, 2010 at 10:22 pm
Kathe
 2 

Pleased to hear the gander tweaked you! And yes indeed, old-school porn has no airbrush … “Early” porn is probably Lascaux-age, right? :)

July 29th, 2010 at 7:10 am

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment